Certain characteristics away from Spouse A beneficial, Partner B, and you will Spouse C were demonstrated like in Part 1

Contour 2. Part 2 contains one or two phase: rating on the computer and finishing the new PLS. That it figure presents good schematic depiction of your own stimuli and you will score activity form of Part 2 (hate). Per feature is actually followed closely by a following bad event, that was shown for 2000 ms or until reaction. The big line expressed a target individual, plus the summation expressed a terrible enjoy. A beneficial 1000 ms inter-stimulus interval was interleaved between for every feature and you may bad skills.

Very first, members have been questioned to learn a narrative and you will that is amazing they was in fact the newest protagonist (look for Second Material). 2nd, the players were requested to help you keep in mind relevant secret factual statements about on their own because of the responding to sentences beginning with “I’m…” After this, members was basically trained to read three vignettes outlining three different things. For each vignette on it the fresh protagonist and you will three objectives. Players had been requested to remember the pointers relating to for each target due to 100 % free recall. Participants had been then asked to visualize which they have been in the good partnership towards target.

Recommendations and you can Proportions

I made use of Elizabeth-Perfect 2.0 presenting things inside the a random order [i integrated 15 key products regarding for each vignette toward discovering information of any target (select Additional Table S1)]. Adopting the users examined the information presented, it finished the fresh new score activity on the pc and done new PLS in Region 1 and Region dos. Members gave you to definitely love score for every single item for every address person in Area 1 and another hate score for each negative experience for each and every target member of Area 2, including a few PLS scores pre postordre brude lovlige eller ulovlige and post the newest negative occurrences.

Simply 1, i expected players to visualize on their own given that protagonist whenever learning happening, after which rate for every trait demonstrated with respect to simply how much like they sensed toward an objective in line with the showed has of your own around three needs (step 1 = none; 6 = high love). Next, we used the PLS determine participants’ attitude of love which have the three purpose.

Simply 2 of try, the backdrop functions out-of A good, B, and you can C was basically unchanged; but not, we created vignettes where in actuality the aim betrayed the newest protagonist, for example by having an affair having some one of contrary sex (comprehend the bad incidents within the Secondary Table S1). Participants were following expected so you’re able to rate just how much dislike it considered on A good, B, and you may C (step one = none; 6 = high hate). Through to end of Region dos, players done the fresh new PLS once more to evaluate the attitude regarding like towards the the three targets.

Analysis

I put several analyses to check on our very own hypotheses. Brand new ratings out-of like recommendations, hate product reviews, as well as the PLS factors was indeed averaged inside sufferers before the analyses. Particularly, we used one to-way frequent tips out-of research off difference (ANOVA) to check on to have variations in participants’ love reviews, dislike ratings, and you may PLS score getting aim An effective, B, and you can C; such analyses was indeed presented to own problems which have and rather than betrayal (Region step one and you may dos). Easy impact tests was performed in the event that correspondence impression try tall.

At the same time, we put a good step 3 (target: Good, B, and C) ? dos (time: just before compared to. after) two-ways frequent procedures ANOVA to research the amount of like height seen of the protagonist in terms of the three purpose before and you may adopting the negative situations. Second, i put a good 3 (target: Good, B, and you may C) ? 2 (affect: like against. hate) two-ways regular steps ANOVA to research the partnership between the love and dislike score. Examination regarding easy head consequences were performed when a connections effect is actually statistically significant. At exactly the same time, we put Pearson’s correlation study to evaluate the latest correlations ranging from ratings having love and you may dislike. Next, i used limited correlations to examine the relationship anywhere between like and you will dislike controlling to have participants’ gender and you may ages.